Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manifesto (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 12:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Manifesto (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

It is a very short article lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Max Viwe |  Wanna chat with me?  16:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment, I am hoping more people will add more on the article, I myself don't know much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate1214 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, if above issues are not addressed. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails WP:NBOOK. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  19:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this book. Joe Chill (talk) 20:27, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BK; "...failing to satisfy them is not a criterion for speedy deletion."
 * This isn't speedy deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 20:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete i think the book is this one, and it has no isbn, nonnotable publisher. unless someone can find coverage, it should go. or maybe its this or maybe they are the same. i give up.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * On the fence. The book listed at Amazon and the book for sale at Microcosm Publishing do seem to be one and the same book, per this page at the apparent publisher's apparent website www.dedrabbit.com. This one was almost as perplexing to research as the recently AfD'd A (2002 film).  I did turn up multiple examples of coverage in alternative news publications:
 * this review in a November 2006 OC Weekly;
 * this one from the Sacramento News & Review;
 * a brief write-up in the Montreal Mirror;
 * a review in a 2007 ReGen Magazine (this magazine doesn't have a Wikipedia page but does appear to be cited in quite a few existing WP articles, so maybe it's RS);
 * a write-up in Salient, a student magazine from Victoria University of Wellington (N.Z.).


 * Enough for WP:GNG? Maybe, maybe not.  But there is enough here to put a little bit of substance into an article, and I think my opinion would be swayed to keep by just one more solid source. Maybe someone will turn it up before the AfD closes.--Arxiloxos (talk) 22:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.