Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manimala Girls High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snow Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Manimala Girls High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Because its not a notable school. Starship9000 (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure that schools have to be notable in order to get an article do they?Theroadislong (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep for the usual reasons. Verified secondary school. Nomination is laughably subjective. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 22:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 22:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep as per Necrothesp. No reason to drag this out. — Theo polisme  01:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - No evidence of WP:BEFORE due diligence; has a Google search in Bengali been carred out for example? We keep high schools for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Indian schools because, unlike US schools for example, they don't dump everything on the Internet. Indeed, very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this school cannot meet notability requirements. TerriersFan (talk) 02:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Terriers pretty much summed it up  Jay Jay What did I do? 02:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Was established way back in 1939. Shyamsunder (talk) 05:47, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per TerriersFan. Schools, especially high schools, are always considered notable if they are confirmed to exist. Shame that Indian schools can't have a better internet presence. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I am not sure what Starship9000 has against topics regarding Indian things, because this is not the only thing that he has attempted to edit with a racial tone. Look at the user's history and you see that he has a little agenda with these things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julser1 (talk • contribs) 04:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Please assume good faith. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - I could have sworn I added a keep to this, but I must have missed it or failed to save it.  My Standard Reasons --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Nomination has failed to show how this case-by-case look at this school is any different than WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Mkdw talk 09:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep – Secondary schools are typically considered as appropriate to have a stand-alone article, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Notability (high schools). Northamerica1000(talk) 07:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.