Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Choudhary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Manish Choudhary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this, this, this and this. Notifying authors and  and interested subject users, , , , ,  and possibly  (moved the article) and  who may want to comment. SwisterTwister  talk  07:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Alts per WP:INDAFD: "Manish Choudhary"


 * Keep as notable per meeting WP:ENT. While yes, it needs better sourcing, such ARE available... and in their being available and the article thus improvable, its needing work is no cause for deletion. Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Satisfies criteria #1 of WP:NACTOR. Has acted in multiple notable films with few of his roles being one of the significant ones. Also, Google results show that he has received good enough mention in film reviews and in some interviews.  Ya sh!  11:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per Yash!. Has had significant roles in at least 4 films (perhaps more, I stopped there): Uvaa, Bombay Velvet, Maazii, and Jannat 2.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Thanks for the ping. Agree with editors above that Choudhary is notable according to guidelines. Also meets WP:GNG AusLondonder (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.