Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Gupta (chancellor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Manish Gupta (chancellor)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non-notable biography in which all the references come from a school that this person works at. There are no independent sources that can establish the notability of the article subject. This article clearly fails GNG and the user who created it, HariSinghw, is creating nothing but a mess on Wikipedia where he creates articles with no intention to improve them later on. He is not familiar with Wikipedia guidelines even after multiple notices on his talk page which list a massive amount of notices of AFD, CFD, TFD, articles moving into draft space, etc. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I find it rather ironic that someone who blatantly defies Wikipedia policies and guidelines, by, for example, edit-warring WP:PROD tags back into articles and not notifying article creators of deletion nominations, should accuse others of not being familiar with them. Pots and kettles spring to mind. Phil Bridger (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I wasn't edit warring with the tags. They were removed without a reason given. Check the edit history if you care to. Which you clearly haven't from your remark. I understand the policies and guidelines. And this user clearly doesn't understand the guidelines after multiple warnings and discussions otherwise he wouldn't have been a subject of an ANI discussion. You seem to have a problem with PROD's for whatever reason given the history you've had with other editors over this and given your attitude from the last AFD. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Of course you were edit warring. WP:PROD is perfectly clear that anyone can contest deletion on any or no grounds, and that the tag shouldn't be replaced if that happens. You did so. Start listening to advice rather than making edits that defy Wikipedia policies and guidelines, while simultaneously accusing others of doing what you do. Maybe a good start would be to start replying to messages on your talk page rather than just removing and ignoring them. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I do respond and I can remove messages if I want. If you're not here to vote, then don't bother editing the Afd. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  09:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * delete no indication of notability, the school he is chancellor of exists since 2014. --hroest 13:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL - chancellor in the former British empire is akin to chairperson of the board of trustees in the United States. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.