Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish K. Sethi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Manish K. Sethi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination on behalf of User:2601:483:4700:2e:d3e:8269:eb14:a4ae, whose rationale was "This wikipedia article is likely written by the subject himself as a press release and lacks notability. Propose to delete the article." Relevant criteria is probably WP:NPROF, since the main claim of notability is being lead author of a scholarly work. The other claim is that the subject is the director of a university-based institute, but the institute does not appear to have an article or otherwise to be notable. It's possible that the subject wrote the article, but there isn't any hard evidence to support that claim. I note also that the subject is early in his career, so WP:USUAL may apply. I'd likely !vote Delete if this came up in the log, so I'll recommend Delete on the merits. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: looks like a LinkedIn entry rather than a Wikipedia article ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure about notability, but if it's kept, it needs to be majorly rewritten. Natureium (talk) 15:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like a solid, competent, professional, and they don't meet the notability guidelines. The prose is a train wreck - I've removed a bunch of it as a blatant copyvio. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:07, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.