Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manmadhan Ambu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. There are strong arguments put forward that the subject meets the relevant notability guidelines, and those arguments have clear consensus support. Mkativerata (talk) 04:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Manmadhan Ambu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

In May I prodded this article about “a forthcoming film” citing WP:Crystal, but it was de-prodded with the reason “refs say filming began in April 2010. per WP:NFF it is enough to keep the article, as this is a notable film starring notable actors”. It is now the end of August and the film has still not yet been released. It is not notable as an unreleased film. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Quable (talk) 20:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails notability criteria for films. [[User:Armbrust| Armbrust Talk  Contribs  22:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete : The filming began on April 2010 and it is set for a November 2010 release on the occasion of Diwali.The following references say that 90%of the movie is over and the post production work of the movie has started. Valli Narayanan 01:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per WP:NFF. It is a notable film which is still filming and the filming itself is getting continuous coverage. The scheduled release date is first week of November 2010]. What we have here is a notable film with notable actors and notable director for which production work has began and the filming itself is being covered continuously in the media. enought to satisfy WP:NFF--Sodabottle (talk) 03:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep with respects to the good faith of the nominator. Meeting WP:NFF is meeting WP:NFF. There is no demand that a project IN principle filming must be released immediately. Users Valli Narayanan and Sodabottle have shown it meeting both WP:NFF and WP:GNG.  Consideration toward WP:BEFORE would have encouraged looking beyond current state to the sources available for improvement.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Article easily meets WP:NFF. There's no requirement that the film be completed or released to be notable. It should not have been nominated IMO. Zane Murphy (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.