Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannathoor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Mannathoor

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod (believe it or not). I don't know what this Mannathoor is because the text is nonsense to me, but there were only 78 G-hits so I don't think it's a place or a notable person. The bottom half looks like a class quiz or exam. I'm not sure what's going on here but it doesn't belong here. Krakatoa Katie  14:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. - Krakatoa  Katie  14:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD, see Patent nonsense: "Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever", which this certainly is. I'm going to tag this for speedy deletion.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Perfect example of WP:BOLLOCKS and/or what can be achieved by the use of LSD --WebHamster 15:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment, I removed the speedy tag since I don't believe it's patent nonsense. You can read the text and see that it's supposedly a village in the Kerala district of India, and previously a part of Travancore. However, since I can't verify any of it (through casual googling of Mannathoor, Mannathur, or Mannathore), and don't see the relevance of the latter part of it, it's probably better off gone unless someone who knows better can rewrite and source it. - Bobet 16:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 17:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * DELETE It takes a lot of work to wade through the confusion of this article just to figure out what the editor was TRYING to say, and then we can't independently verify any of it.  it could even be a hoax-- we just don't know. But in any case there's no excuse for such unintelligible blathering to be anywhere other than the sandbox.  I love this quotation about going out of the house without a bathrobe:   'Nuff said. OfficeGirl 18:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonsense. CSD G1. Dean Wormer 05:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.