Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannntv


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The comments show our usual consensus on articles of this nature.  DGG ( talk ) 00:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Mannntv

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a YouTube channel, which just demonstrates its existence and fails to credibly demonstrate its notability. Article relies entirely on primary sources, with not a shred of reliable source coverage in sight — and if you compare the creator's username (User:Bongo Emme) to the surnames of the three people involved in producing the channel, the likely conflict of interest is apparent. In truth, this is an A7 speedy — but somebody already tried that and it was declined by another editor with no rationale given (the fact that the declining editor has a longer edit history, and no apparent COI connection to the creator, being the only reason I'm not just overriding them.) As always, Wikipedia is not a place where every YouTuber is entitled to an article just because they exist — they only get over our inclusion bar when enough reliable source coverage can be added to get them over WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - My searches found nothing good to suggest improvement or notability, with the best results here and here (press release and one YouTube link). SwisterTwister   talk  05:26, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree completely with Bearcat. The article says they have 150,000 subscribers which sounds like a lot except on YouTube, to be in the Top 100 most subscribed channels, the minimum number of subscribers is 6.8 million. I don't think this channel meets YouTube notability standards. Liz  Read! Talk! 00:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.