Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manny Pacquiao Hearted Fist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 03:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Manny Pacquiao Hearted Fist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a promotional article about a non-notable 'painting'. I changed it to a redirect to the perp,(who I believe is the creator of this thing, but got reverted. TheLongTone (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable and promotional.  Not worth even a redirect.  As per the nominator there is a clear COI for this article.  The COI extends heavily into the article on the artist himself and also another painting article A Thousand and One Lives which should also be the subject of an AfD.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Kellymoat (talk) 20:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Nickrds09  (Talk to me) 06:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This art is not independently notable. No need for a redirect. Btw, this is one of the most blatant cases of COI I have ever seen. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Too late to add A Thousand and One Lives directly to this AfD so I created separate Articles for deletion/A Thousand and One Lives.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - bad art about celebrities are so common as to be cliched. Bearian (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.