Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manny Stul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Manny Stul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have serious doubts whether the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. All coverage (here's best: ) is related to her winning the 2015 Australian EY (Ernst & Young) Entrepreneur Of The Year Award. Everything else is in passing. So, first strike is WP:ONEEVENT. Regarding the award itself, it's a national award, that I don't think would be notable on its own and therefore is unlikely to be sufficient to give the winner notability on their own. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

It appears Manny Stul has won two awards for 2015 Australian Entrepreneur Of The Year and 2015 National Industry category winner. (Noted here: )Susangrigg1 (talk) 16:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom, suffers from 1EVENT. Delta13C (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as mentioned, unlikely better notable yet. SwisterTwister   talk  05:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, unfortunately Manny does not meet wikipedia notability requirements. Ernst & Young Australian Entrepreneur of the Year and coverage of such in addition to his personal activities and background is not sufficient, and I could not find grounds to meet the notability requirements. However, I notice most of the encyclopaedic content exists in the Moose Toys article anyways. I've made an effort to migrate across the references missing. Aeonx (talk) 10:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.