Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Anand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 03:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Manoj Anand

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable actor. No independent sources that I can find and the Hindi version of this article is similarly under-referenced. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film,  and Uttar Pradesh. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

 Keep  The person on whom this article is mentioned has worked in many notable films ranging from Hindi cinema to English cinema and its information is easily available on Google. The actor has worked in many films of national and international level. These are remarkable actors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by अ-ह (talk • contribs) 21:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @अ-ह: being in many notable films does not make that actor notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. To show notability, that person needs to have significant coverage in reliable sources. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Notability isn't inherited. Donald D23   talk to me  01:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Question: WP:NACTOR says that an actor may be considered notable if "the person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". Does that contradict what you're saying about inheritability, or am I misunderstanding it? Toughpigs (talk) 02:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
 * NACTOR is not a secondary notability guideline; it just indicates that something will generally have SIGCOV in RSes if it meets that criterion: Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. Additionally, acting in minor roles generally doesn't meet NACTOR, otherwise every working actor would meet that guideline. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article fails wp:n with unreliable sources. Source like rottentomatoes do not even have any significant information on this actor. RangersRus (talk) 02:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.