Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Pradhan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Manoj Pradhan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable writer per WP:CREATIVE, unreferenced vanity page, can find no reliable sources online per WP:RS to support notability MuffledThud (talk) 06:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —MuffledThud (talk) 06:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable despite self-claims of great importance; completely promotional. Drawn Some (talk) 07:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - pompous, self-promotional, unverifiable. andy (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 09:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. A straight Google search yields interesting results, but they probably suggest that the name Manoj Pradhan is held by several people. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 22:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - part of a WP:Walled garden: see also WP:Articles for deletion/Jasodhara and WP:Articles for deletion/Jasodhara global media MuffledThud (talk) 05:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment Dear Wikipedians, I appreciate the need for more references to make an article better. However, confining references to the web only definitely shows lack of foresight and wisdom. India is a country that is still far from being webbed substantially to trace every references on it. A true encyclopaedia must reflect facts that can be traced from all sources i.e, print sources, web sources, people and culture etc. Piyushsao (talk), 5 May 2009 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jasodhara" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.19.60.7 (talk) 05:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG. Lets wait for the magnum opus (“The Truth”) to be published, reviewed and duly acknowledged. As India's motto states Satyameva Jayate - we can be patient. :) Abecedare (talk) 06:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.