Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Tiwari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Deletion concerns have been addressed. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  04:50, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Manoj Tiwari

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article contains potentially libelous *and* exaggerated information in all sections. Noopur28 (talk) 21:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - that is not a reason to delete. Fix the information that you consider to be inappropriate. Without having trawled through all the citations yet, I note that there are plenty of them. - Sitush (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That is precisely the problem, rewrite it. However, this page has been lying around like this for a long time. I may have been harsh and am probably not the best person to write this article but it does present an extremely skewed picture. Fix it if you are contesting it. Noopur28 (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please go to the article talk page and explain what you perceived to be skewed and I will fix it for you. Right now, after a quick run-through, it does appear that the statements are supported by the sources. - Sitush (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article has been cleaned up a lot by Sitush. Libelious and exaggerated information is no reason to delete an article anyway -- you can simply be bold and remove it. utcursch | talk 06:18, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements made which have addressed the nominator's concerns.Kudos to User:Sitush, for showing that addressable issues are rarely a cause for deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.