Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoli Wetherell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to  Uncanny X-Men. Spartaz Humbug! 17:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Manoli Wetherell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced as to her job and the notability that the job creates. The fact that a comic book uses the same name for a character is not noteworthy (the comic character is a news reporter & this BLP is a broadcast technician). Fails WP:GNG. – S. Rich (talk) 03:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 03:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 03:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Neutral: I'm the creator of the entry. I agree that as it stands now deletion is appropriate. I wonder, though, if it might make sense to have an entry for the Manoli Wetherell character simply as a Marvel character, and possibly note there the inspiration as to the character? AtomikWeasel (talk) 19:58, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Suggestion: Without looking at the supporting references, or how the character fits into the series, you might add mention at Uncanny X-Men. I see various characters given brief introductions in that sectopm. (Or there may be another series which is more appropriate.) I do not opine on whether the Manoli comic character is notable. But I do not think the development of a comic character with the same name confers notability on the real Wetherell person. – S. Rich (talk) 00:49, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. I've made a short addition for the Manoli Wetherell character, with an appropriate cite, as you suggest. AtomikWeasel (talk) 08:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect as above to Uncanny X-Men --j⚛e deckertalk 18:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.