Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manon von Gerkan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Manon von Gerkan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The "logic" for keeping this article in the first AfD was absolutely stupid. It was really every reason why notability is not inherited. You mean to say that being the "partner" of David Blaine is a valid reason to keep this article? My jaw is about to hit the floor. And of course, predictably, the problems of this article were never rectified upon keeping. Even the "snow keep" voter gave reason why sources were NOT reliable. This article is 4 fucking sentences! One of them is "she is the daughter of..." and "the former girlfriend of..." in the same damn sentence. Someone even tried to justify unreliable and unacceptable source IMDb as a reason to keep. What is this website coming to. Trillfendi (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. I would ask the nominator to keep the anger out of his or her nominations. It doesn't help. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not angry.... I'm just telling the truth. Trillfendi (talk) 17:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Whether you're angry or not, your rhetoric is unconstructive.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Look past what you think the "tone" is and simply see it for what it is: an article of 4 sentences whose claim to notability is that she once dated a magician. Absurdity. Trillfendi (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Greetings, Trillfendi. I second the comments by Bbb23 and Eastmain. The AfD process is already arduous as it is and commentary that invites friction does not help. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 18:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Cut out the swearing, this is read by minors Atlantic306 (talk) 16:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Minors reading a deletion page on Wikipedia isn’t going to reform freedom of speech. But since Bbb23 wants to leave it there, it is what it is. 4 poorly sourced sentences. Trillfendi (talk) 16:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:ENTERTAINER, "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." - Epinoia (talk) 00:37, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails WP:ANYBIO & WP:ENT. -The Gnome (talk) 18:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.