Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manslamming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Manslamming

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a non-notable neologism. There appears to have been brief coverage (click-baity, not entirely serious, low quality journalism) of this concept but it is insufficient WP:DEPTH of coverage in the few sources that mention the term. Deli nk (talk) 18:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete for the above reasons. --ChiveFungi (talk) 19:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: It looks like "that's not a thing", as people say these days. Came and gone in a few days.  "Manslamming" sounds like a good description of this kind of phony this-is-what-we-think-attracts-feminists-to-our-tampon-and-car-ads content that's been floating around the past couple of years. --Closeapple (talk) 16:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEOLOGISM, WP:NOTDICT, and lack of WP:SUSTAINED coverage. - GretLomborg (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.