Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Custódia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:19, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Manuel Custódia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sign of any notability found. Kleuske (talk) 14:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * DELETE No notability established and article is full of WP:PEACOCKy terms. &bull;≈20+&pi;(talk to me!) 14:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: No sign of notability through examination of reliable sources. &mdash; Javert2113 (talk; please ping me when you reply) 15:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Edit: struck the word "reliable" out. There is one, possibly reliable source, but most of the other references link to other Wikipedia pages. &mdash; Javert2113 (Let's chat!) 15:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 17:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 17:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I think he's close to notability, and the article certainly has been picked up by a number of different languages (not a sign of notability in and of itself.) A television show he was on was nominated for an Emmy, and he's sort of notable for being cast as a baby. The problem is there aren't many if any reliable sources outside of the usual unreliable imdb/social media/celebrity-scrape websites. If someone can demonstrate some reliable sources in any language, change me to a keep. SportingFlyer  talk  21:39, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Some reliable sources should be added but the fact that there is a kind of fame, based on the languages and an imdb developed page, including connections to relevant celebrities via social media is relevant. The fact that he had a leading role in an international film is also something to bare in mind. I'll try to find reliable sources by respecting the work of at least 10 Wiki pages around the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisempra (talk • contribs) 20:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * KEEP: Having multiple languages is a sign of notability but, following the Wikipedia guideline there are some reliable sources on the article. The fact that it has been active for almost 2 years shows something too. In individual terms, having the record of being the youngest actor in the world performing a leading role in a TV series, proved by a source or by a quick search online and a leading role in an international film is relevant. At 16, having more than 5 projects in your cv is kind of hard, I think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:67F3:1201:6D43:ED23:951C:DE05 (talk) 20:32, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Notability is not found by existing in multiple languages on wikipedia, since different languages have different notability criteria. It is even less established when those articles in other languages have been created by substantially the same user. I haven't come across "polyglot spam" before, but Wikisempra has made contributions to almost if not all of the languages along with the IP 85.242.113.222. Fact is, I looked through the sources in all of these languages to help see if there were other notable sources and found none. All of the mentions of him in the article are trivial and mostly focus on the characters he's played instead of him. He's currently also undergoing a deletion review in French. SportingFlyer  talk  22:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I just wanted to save the article. My objective is to keep the Wikipedia Community content real and structured by helping in English Wikipedia or in other languages where I feel able to. The kid in question is part of a group of people that I’ve been editing during the last year. I think that it is obvious that it’s sad for an editor, to see articles where you spent time editing, or even creating, being nominated for elimination. I just want to let people know who is the person they’re searching for. Although I think he’s relevant, I understand if the decision is deleting. Yours sincerely, James (Wikisempra). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisempra (talk • contribs) 23:29, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability, run on the mill. The editor  whose username is Z0 08:39, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.