Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel D'Lima

Manuel D'Lima

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. None of the sources are about him. Sources (and much of the content) are about taitrs. Material on him is just resume type material. North8000 (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to assess new additions to the article since it's nomination. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Still no review of additions to the article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Theatre,  and India. Shellwood (talk) 17:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Poor to unreliable sources with no significant coverage on the subject. The subject fails notability. RangersRus (talk) 18:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Goa and Maharashtra.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment a number of references are from offline books. Has the nominator managed to access them ? Atlantic306 (talk) 18:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * It's hard to answer with respect to what you are seeing because there have been 104 edits to the article since I nominated this. But I did evaluate them at the time. North8000 (talk) 18:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, a lot was added after you nominated this, including several refs, but much of it was WP:PROMO, fluff, repetition, and stuff about the genre of theatre that, I think, has no direct relevance to D'Lima's career. I tried to reduce the promo, cruft, repetition and tangential stuff, but someone else should review the refs to see if they actually discuss Liima's life or career at all. -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.