Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Jiménez (boxer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Manuel Jiménez (boxer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer that fails NBOX and GNG. 2 . O . Boxing 19:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  19:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  19:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  19:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable boxer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - As both sources come from the exact same website. The boxer is not notable, as he really didn't do anything that was really worth covering. I found absolutely nothing about the boxer. 🌴Koridas🌴 (Negotiate) 08:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet WP:NBOX and my search didn't find the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG. Winning a title in one of the many minor boxing organizations is not enough to show notability, especially when he won less than half his fights. Papaursa (talk) 12:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Only thing I could find was a marriage notice.  scope_creep Talk  18:42, 15 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.