Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufacturers survival

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.Woohookitty 9 July 2005 08:32 (UTC)

Manufacturers survival
It might be tempting to want to WP:Cleanup this article but the concept of "Manufacturers survivial" (sic) does not appear to exist in any encylopaedic sense. Though it scores plenty of Google hits, they are just the ordinary English usage of the two contiguous words. Reading the article carefully reveals that it is simply advertising copy, intended to point to a website. Cutler June 30, 2005 10:26 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I'm just not sure it is encylopedic. These steps are nothing more then sound business practices that most companies should be following.  Of course the formatting of the article does make it harder to read.  Vegaswikian 1 July 2005 05:16 (UTC)
 * Ugh, a poor translation. I see it's been cross-linked with a pair of other articles on manufaturing, but the entries there are also poorly written. Perhaps archive somewhere for a re-write. Right now it's in delete territory. &mdash; RJH 1 July 2005 17:19 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is nothing but promotional material for the editor's own websites. It's also very hard to comprehend and would require a lot of work to fix the English. &mdash;MementoVivere 4 July 2005 02:04 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.