Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mao Kobayashi (actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Mao Kobayashi (actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: insufficient notability per WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Quis separabit? 21:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Very easily passes WP:GNG. She not only was a popular TV personality, but she married the most popular young kabuki actor. There are numerous articles about her or them:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , etc. etc. There's even some in English: , , , , , etc. Even the Wall Street Journal: . May I ask if the nominator tried to search for these before nominating this for AfD, per WP:BEFORE? Michitaro (talk) 00:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - references provided in article do not indicate that WP:ENTERTAINER notability criteria is met.--Rpclod (talk) 01:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * While I disagree, even if she fails WP:ENTERTAINER (which should not be judged by what is in the article but by what is out there, per WP:NRVE), she is notable if she passes WP:GNG. See WP:BASIC.Michitaro (talk) 02:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources found - They're not perfect by all means but notability does seem to be there. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, easily passes WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, which override WP:ENTERTAINER. Cavarrone  16:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.