Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Map of the Invisible World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Mark Arsten (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Map of the Invisible World

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The page lacks any references and very little information about the book is given. The notability of the book is in question. Ctoshw (talk) 07:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. In this case there were plenty of sources out there, they just needed to be added. I don't mean to sound harsh, but it's always a good idea to do a brief search to see if there's anything you can add to the article before nominating it for AfD. Most of the time brief stubs will probably not have anything out there and should be nominated, but occasionally you'll have things like this book that will surprise you with the amount of sources you'll find. No harm done, though and the nom did give the entry some much needed love, so it's all for the good in the long run.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Keep Substantial review coverage, per the sources now in the article (nice work, Tokyogirl79!). Easily passes WP:NBOOK as a result. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Passes WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: I have just added a radio interview about this book that is distributed under a free licence, you didn't look for those things did you? VolodyA! V Anarhist User:Beta_M (converse) 16:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.