Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mapopolis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Mapopolis

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable enough, I see only one old Forbes article, besides that I couldn't find any reliable independent sources indicating the notability.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 12:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment: Besides the Forbes article, I found a few mentions of this through google books [][]. Don't think there is nearly enough here to meet the WP:NCORP though. Let&#39;srun (talk) 19:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Transportation.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with users above me that this company likely fails NCORP, however the Mapopolis Navigator is a historical application that passes the WP:GNG. Since the Navigator was also called Mapopolis there is no need to rename the article. Rather, the opening sentence should be flipped. I am happy to do that. It's about 2 minutes to make some changes for the entire article. gidonb (talk) 23:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep as a page on the app. Hyperbolick (talk) 06:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.