Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mapper orientation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  12:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Mapper orientation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

"Mapper orientation" doesn't appear to exist outside of some forum/blog uses. Xurizuri (talk) 12:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Xurizuri (talk) 12:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Xurizuri (talk) 12:42, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, a search reveals no usable sources like journals or textbooks, so this is not notable. There are some confounding (mapmaking) hits but the picture of non-notability is clear enough. This must be a neologism in forum/blog usage; pseudoscience is not far away. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.