Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maqbool Hassan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 09:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Maqbool Hassan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Highly problematic article has persistently been deleted, draftified, recreated and moved back to mainspace. Subject remains non-notable, coverage sourced to his website, owned media, employer websites. WP:NOTCV and fails WP:GNG. I'm requesting delete and SALT this time around. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Education,  and Pakistan. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * First of all there isn't anything problematic there, and you said that the subject is non-notable, well this is wrong if you google the name "Dr Maqbool Hassan" and "Maqbool Hassan" then you'll find plenty of top search results referring back to the subject "Maqbool Hassan" with Google Knowledge panel with ID /g/11pvqmbmq9, and most of the search results refer to him as "Dr." with his name, because the subject holds a doctoral degree and known mostly by his name "Dr. Maqbool Hassan", for example when you search on Google Scholar with just "Maqbool Hassan" you may not find much about him, but when you search with "Dr. Maqbool Hassan" you'll find most of the articles referring back to him.
 * Secondly, you mentioned about media, so the display picture added to the article is CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) as mentioned on the sourced website's footer, and according to Creative Commons 4.0 we can "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format" with appropriate credit, but yes I forgot to add the credit, and that has been fixed by some wiki contributor in Wikimedia image summery, and can be seen on image page's summery.
 * Thirdly, the tag added at the top of this page and on the main article, saying "Find sources: google (books - news.....)" only enter the query with "Maqbool Hassan" and, as a result not specific search results are coming back, if we entered the query with "Dr. Maqbool Hassan" then in return there will be plenty of specific search results relating to "Maqbool Hassan" aka "Dr. Maqbool Hassan" will return.
 * Here is some of Maqbool's original presence:
 * Google Knowledge Graph ID
 * Google Scholar author ID
 * SSRN author ID
 * ORCID iD
 * ResearchGate profile ID
 * Academia.edu
 * Maqbool's presence on academic journals' editorial team:
 * IRJAIS
 * ARJ
 * so, if you still want to make me discourage again, I guess 6th or 7th time simultaneously, It's your choice, as my another properly sourced article "Diogo Santos Coelho" is on deletion list, and many other were deleted. Anasalaskari (talk) 16:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * What is happening on Wikipedia to beginner editors and contributors is superlatively explained in this article, named "Edit wars in Wikipedia" by R Sumi · 2011 · Cited by 132. I recommend you to give it a read. Anasalaskari (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn; nothing in the article or found via searching indicates that the wiki-notability criteria for academics can be met. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Far WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF C1 notability for this 2014 PhD with around 10 total citations.  The organization he's founded appears too new and of too limited impact to contribute meaningfully to notability.  No other signs of notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 20:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON, as per Russ Woodroofe. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.