Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Benítez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (WP:SNOW) (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 02:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

María Benítez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish that she meets WP:Notability (people) Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject has significant coverage in newspaper and magazine archives satisfying WP:BASIC. See, e.g., New York Magazine, Victoria, Texas, Village Voice, Jacob's Pillow, New London, CT, etc. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Adequate notability established in third party publications, significant in her field.  Montanabw (talk)  04:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:DIDEROT Jim-Siduri (talk) 04:36, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment User:Jim-Siduri has now been blocked for being unconstructive, and I cannot establish where his link was meant to go. If anyone knows, please add it to the discussion. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * See Diderot. I assumed that the redlink was to point out that Jim-Siduri believes we should be more encyclopedic. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 19:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article needs to be beefed up, but she's notable and there is no reason to deleted it. Put a "needs more refs" tags on it so those who want to ref it can. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 16:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. The refs listed above should be added to establish her notability though. Also, not quite sure why there is an "reads like an advertisement" notice, I don't find the article is particularly gushing. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 19:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources found by the IP editor establish notability. Thank you. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  19:17, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:36, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.