Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Cristina Rosas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:41, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

María Cristina Rosas

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

In Spanish. Was deleted from the Spanish Wikipedia under their speedy deletion criterion G3 (the equivalent of our G11, but also applies to autobiographies and soapboxes). Notability is asserted but not established, and even the Spanish version of Google returns nothing helpful. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This article is so terrible, I have not seen why it wasn't speedy deleted under G11. --Cutno (talk) 04:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. G11 or G1 since this is a Non-English article in English Wikipedia . Daa89563 (talk) 04:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note - That's not a speedy deletion criteria. For whatever reason, foreign language articles can persist indefinitely and not meet any CSD criteria. You might be interested in WT:CSD and advancing those criteria. Shadowjams (talk) 07:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * My mistake Daa89563 (talk) 11:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - The machine translation is very readable in English. Based on that, fails WP:PROFESSOR. Shadowjams (talk) 07:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:PROFESSOR is failing this time. JBsupreme (talk) 19:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. GS shows h-index of at most 5, which is way below the typical impact level that we usually consider with respect to WP:PROF. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.