Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maravilla (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    delete. Sources haven't been added since the past AfDs, and notability was not proven.  Jamie ☆ S93  03:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Maravilla
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

DELETE. This article is a joke. Yes, there is some trivial coverage of this gang. If there was anything substantial it would have been added by now, years later. WP:DEADLINE is not a free pass for non-notability. JBsupreme (talk) 06:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability was clearly established in the 3rd AfD. McWomble (talk) 14:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No, not really. Hence the nom.  JBsupreme (talk) 02:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - NN gang. Bearian (talk) 18:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Given four noms going back to 2005, I think it's time to put this one to rest once more. The past noms seem irrelevant now given it's a sub-stub, editors have been given 3 years to gather the required sources but not even notability establishing sources have been added even before it was pared down to the current state never mind the secondary sources. treelo  radda  22:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.