Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Anthony (American football)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Marc Anthony (American football)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NGRIDIRON as he hasn't played at a professional level. Fails WP:GNG as he hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Also fails WP:NCOLLATH. Hack (talk) 06:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I see nothing in his college career to surpass WP:GNG and can find no other measure at this time to surpass notability standards.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:56, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources of his high school, college and professional career. Sources include, , , , . Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment 1 and 5 are reprints of the same article, and some of those look like blogs and not necessarily third party reliable sources... but it's enough for me to switch to Neutral for now and investigate further.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I've completed my review and it looks to me like the only articles from third party reliable sources are local paper (albiet Baltimore Sun) in basic sports transactions blog-type articles. I'd call it borderline at this time, but with no other real support I've decided to return to my original position.  If anyone wants to Userfy the article and take custody, I'm fine with that.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of meeting WP:GNG, Candlebracadabra sources are trivial coverage given to all prospects. Secret account 23:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:36, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails to meet WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:NCOLLATH. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Not all football players are notable. I don't think that not playing in the majors would be considered notable but again not every football players are notable. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.