Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Berkley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   01:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Marc Berkley
Not a single source cited. For someone well known within teenage internet communities, he sure gets few Google results (820), let alone any relevant ones. Sound like vanity nonsense. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 16:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)'


 * Speedy delete Vanity nonsense. --Shizane 16:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete The only thing that comes close to a claim of notability is having founded "MAMB Networks". Whatever that is, it gets a total of 12 unique Google hits, all of which seem to be forums. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I wasn't sure that this fit the criteria for speedy deletion because it at least tried to assert some notability, even if it's of the false sort. I prodded, it was contested, etc. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 16:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable NawlinWiki 17:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, vanity/nonnotable. -- Docether 18:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, without any sources the individual appears to be non-notable. DrunkenSmurf
 * Speedy Delete as nonsense, and per nom. --Arnzy (whats up?)  00:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Utter Nonsense. ViceroyInterus 00:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's not patent nonsense, but I'd entertain a suggestion of speedy deletion for lack of notability. - Richardcavell 00:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom---nonnotable/vanity/nonsense. ---Charles 03:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense and vanity.--Auger Martel 08:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.