Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Darrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Marc Darrow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing sufficient notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agreed per nom. Non-notable doctor, and no means to produce an article due to total lack of RS in existence, aside from this one news story in a CA county paper. -Delta13C (talk) 15:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete now that the article has been hacked down to size, this decision seems easier. I am not so sure that the deletions were correct, but this is not my area of expertise.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete his actions and contributions as a medical doctor do not rise to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Not significant for notability.Politekid (talk) 20:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC) Politekid has been blocked as a sockpuppet.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete No significant citations, editorial work, academic positions or awards that would pass WP:PROF. Though he has written multiple books, none of them have generated significant coverage compatible with a pass of WP:AUTHOR. It looks like he has written three posts for The Huffington Post, but even in 2009 when an SEO/social media consultant wrote this entry, I think that "regular contributions" was really a stretch. A previous version said he "discovered" prolotherapy, but he discovered it as an option for himself - he wasn't the discoverer of prolotherapy. EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.