Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Engelhardt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Marc Engelhardt

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject lacks notability. The article currently lacks references. Even Google can find no useful information that can be regarded as an authoritative source. Dolphin ( t ) 06:35, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — Dolphin  ( t ) 07:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  — Dolphin  ( t ) 11:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - neither English nor German Google provide any Ghits for this Marc Engelhardt. Spanish Wiki article is unreferenced. Fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSN, and WP:BAND. --Kudpung (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - google.com found sources (not wp mirrors) for "Marc Engelhardt" bassoon, and google.de found results for "Marc Engelhardt" fagott. I've added three references. - Pointillist (talk) 22:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep References have now been found and added. WP:MUSICBIO doesn't fit classical musicians very well, but this guy has held a permanent position as principal, performs frequently as a guest principal and soloist, and has taught widely. Particularly for a less prominent instrument, this is a distinguished career. Yngvadottir (talk) 02:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.