Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Geelhoed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Marc Geelhoed

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject  "works in the President's Office of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra on the orchestra's in-house record label, CSO Resound"  and is a blogger. If this sufficient for notability? This article goes back to 2005 but for a long time there has been no progress is establishing notability. Time to delete it?  Klein zach  02:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Lots of people have jobs, and lots of people went to college. Nothing here to satisfy WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 02:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Like the tag states, the article is effectively orphaned, and so doesn't seem to expand from another article providing details. Agree with Edison. ALTON   .ıl  02:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- per Edison, who summed it up prefectly. Reyk  YO!  02:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Edison. Cosmic Latte (talk) 03:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's never appropriate to nominate something for deletion simply because of a long delay in progress; it should be fairly immediately obvious in nearly all cases whether the subject is notable.  In this case, it is obvious he is not, despite being a kind of journalist and working a high-level job.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 04:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Edison. Opus33 (talk) 06:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.