Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Lesage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Marc Lesage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PROF. This is a vanity article created and edited almost exclusively by the subject of the article himself User:Lesagem. Bueller 007 (talk) 17:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:42, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet the notability requirements for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with JPL. WorldCat shows none of his books break triple digit holdings (sort a low bar). Seems to be an autobio, also an orphan, and is almost all OR. Not a controversial case. Agricola44 (talk) 16:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.