Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Lichte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Marc Lichte

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Once again a DEPROD of the Editor Andrew Davidson (the 5th in the last 3 days) w/o explaining why nor informing the PRODer - WP:BEFORE does not give any source establishing notability per WP:BIO CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep As a major VW designer and now head of design at Audi, the subject has designed about 100 cars, and so they pass WP:ARCHITECT. There's a correspondingly large amount of coverage in the motoring press. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep We head to Audi’s HQ in Ingolstadt, Germany, to meet head of design Marc Lichte, AD sits down with Audi’s design director Marc Lichte to discuss all that went into creating the e-tron GT, We recently spoke to Marc Lichte about Audi’s future product plans and how they’ll reflect the next-generation of Audi vehicles., Audi design boss Marc Lichte talks about the E-Tron GT, e-Tron Gran Turismo is 'The Most Beautiful Car I Have Ever Drawn': Audi Design Head, Audi A8 will debut the Swedish mark's Lichte design language, named after chief designer Marc Lichte., concedes Marc Lichte, father of the fifth - generation Golf and chief of VW ' s Design Studio Two. I could go on for a long time with these. The guy is clearly notable, easily passing WP:ARCHITECT 1, 3, 4C and 4D. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Scot. I...understand the frustration demonstrated by the OP, but have discussed with them elsewhere that complaining "PROD is a broken process" is often not backed up by actual demonstration of PROD being a broken process. Vaticidalprophet 19:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , surprising that you found today especially only to my two initiated AfDs. do you know WP:HOUND ?! CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm currently, actively in the process of going through open AfDs and responding to interesting ones, which is something I do all the time. It is entirely irrelevant to you. Vaticidalprophet 20:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.