Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Panther


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. L Faraone  01:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Marc Panther

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails WP:GNG and notability template was in place for 5 years warning of the problem. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 20:29, 20 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and. Unscintillating (talk) 13:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)]
 * Redirect to Globe (band) as per WP:MUSICBIO is there is no evidence of individual notability. AllyD (talk) 20:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Globe (band). Insufficient in-depth coverage to justify a self-standing biographical article like this. --DAJF (talk) 02:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for sock puppetry per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Crtew (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: Also removed nominator's vote inside nomination. Crtew (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Note that Marc Panther as a solo artist has one charting single (see here). This fulfills criterion two for WP:MUSICBIO, even if it only charted at number 90--the criterion does not specify how high it has to rank. One can in addition also find independent coverage in multiple sources (some of which is not positive: he was suspected of being involved in a shady business):, , , , , etc.. Michitaro (talk) 02:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.