Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcel J. Melançon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Marcel J. Melançon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Currently fails WP:SIGCOV, but potentially notable. Can find much about him at all. Been on the cat:nn list for more than 10 years. So could he be an emeritus professor by now?  scope_creep Talk  18:49, 3 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 19:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment His work seems to have been cited/critically discussed several times in French GScholar, if not the individual, the book certainly is notable. Oaktree b (talk) 20:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: fascinatingly low web footprint. Here's a list of his books (as of 2005): . And did you notice that he's also an artist? . So maybe a WP:GNG pass through Quebec newspapers, if anyone's interested in digging through proquest for them. -- asilvering (talk) 05:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Need some book review to pass WP:NAUTHOR or some additional references to show he is notable, for the article.   scope_creep Talk  05:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm aware. You'll notice I didn't vote keep. -- asilvering (talk) 05:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Looking at google scholar it didn't look to me like there were enough citations to meet WP:NPROF. My search didn't find reviews of his books to show WP:NAUTHOR is met. I also didn't see significant independent coverage that meets the GNG. I found several sources listing his works, but they were either from his publisher and/or the university he was teaching.Sandals2 (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I found one published review including a co-edited volume by the subject among four reviewed books,, not enough for WP:AUTHOR. His book on Camus is well-cited for philosophy, but not enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF. And I didn't find evidence of other notability criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - although he's only an associate professor, he work on the ethics of testing is very much at the cutting edge of bioethics. I have taught this topic in my AP Biology class. Bearian (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.