Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcelo Sabbatini (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Buck  ets  ofg 21:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Marcelo Sabbatini (2nd nomination)

 * (2nd nomination)– (View AfD) (View log)


 * Strong delete. Article has already been deleted once. Same reasons as before as he has not become notable in the mean time.Mr.K. (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Having been through a deletion discussion already, I assume this article is about as improved as it is going to get right now. It is written well, but when you get right down to it, it says he is a newly-minted PhD and professor who spent time working on online scientific journals and web-based education... not really terribly exciting. --Brianyoumans 23:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * weak delete based on the article, and assuming it all Verifiable, it is not enough from the point of view of a conventional academic career. I am not sure how to evaluate it otherwise--there are a large number of very informal publications--this is a continuing problem with those publishing mainly on the internet. Using the experimental indexes Citeseer and Citebase, which do cover information science and related fields, I found no articles and only 1 possible citation  to his work. There is a language barrier, because most such indexes do not make a serious attempt to cover non-english language sources. The subject of the article should be able to document references to his work, which can then be verified--if he or his relatives see this, that's something that might help. Please do not speedy close, to provide an opportunity..  DGG 00:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: His mom recreated this article, which means WP:CSD applies.  The last Afd should have been relisted for having insufficient input, so please dont steamroll this one.  Her article is also on Afd. John Vandenberg 16:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. --MaNeMeBasat 14:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.