Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March 1, 1995


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 00:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

March 1, 1995

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unless this is part of some series of articles that I am unaware of, I am note sure that the subject of the article meets WP:GNG. Not to mention the article seems to stray quite a bit from the actual subject of the article. For example, "the connected astrological sign for this date is Pisces. A symbol of a fish represents Pisces. The element for Pisces is water.." Needs to either be rewritten to highlight the actual notable events that occurred on this day, or deleted. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 18:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Anything of note could be added to the March 1 article. The specific date with year however is not notable. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:51, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- is this perhaps a joke article? :-) It opens thusly:
 * March 1, 1995 was a Wednesday. Bill Clinton was the President of the United States. Holidays on this date include Saint David's Day and Self-injury Awareness Day. The connected astrological sign for this date is Pisces.


 * K.e.coffman (talk) 19:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing notable about this day. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 03:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - other than the founding of Yahoo!, nothing really historic happened on this date. Bearian (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are plenty of sources that provide accounts of the events that occurred on any given day of the last 100 or so years, but I am very hesitant to create a precedent where every day in history gets its own encyclopedia article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 06:04, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * DElete -- Allowing it would create a precedent that we would regret for having a daily article on every day. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.