Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 12:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

March Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Asserts WP:ORG and fails and subsequently fails WP:GNG Utterly non notable PR firm. Also another org which reads like an advertising page, which it's own brand. scope_creep talk  20:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - only see one independent ref really covering the company. Most of the rest appear to be press releases. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP; as noted above, most of the "references" are press releases. --MelanieN (talk) 01:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP, most of the citations are to sources that are decried at WP:CORPDEPTH. At the 46th Annual Bell Ringer Awards they received one "Silver bell" and an honorable mention. Lacks in depth coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 05:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG.   Jim Carter (from public cyber)  10:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.