Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March turbo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   06:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

March turbo
Very, very, very bad formatting (almost unreadable), possible copy+paste.--Zxcvbnm 21:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

The exhibition origin did De from my own Brog article to Omoto's writing and an original original. Please refer to UserCarNoteID=77289 URL. It is proof. ･Indication rule Wikipedia GFDL OK 1 and public organization contribution condition of condition. Only "Use with GFDL" is allowed. Only condition 2(I) and the original person in question can use the original, and contribute. It needing becomes condition 2(Ro) and a pertinent matter. It allows it the encouragement as for the postscript and the retouch. Or, it can be a reprint by the origin of this original person in question allowance. --ek-10st Toyama 14:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)ek-10stとやま/ek-10st Toyama
 * Delete unless it gets fixed *real* quick - I can't even fiugure what this is about - & smells of poss copyvio as well due to appearing to be cut&paste.Bridesmill 22:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Incomprehensible. Almost reads like a cut and paste from a foreign language that was run through a machine translator. Fan1967 22:46, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * March turbo

↑私の母国語、J「日本語」で記しますと、 このマーチターボの記事は私が自分のブログから出典しています. GFDL許可もページに 貼っています. 確かに英文は上手くありませんが、 そちらのベテランな、どなたかに加筆依頼しようかと考えていました. お願いですから削除依頼は少し考えなおして下さい. --219.114.63.247 15:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)ダブルチャージクラブ、ek-10stとやま「Toyama」


 * Delete. Apparently done in good faith, this nonetheless fails.  Madman 19:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as completely incomprehensible, as per above.--Jslasher 00:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.