Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marchex (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  11:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Marchex
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Results are limited to routine announcements and other churnalism, nothing in depth to come even close to N:CORP. Star  Mississippi  18:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, Computing,  and Washington.  Star   Mississippi  18:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Tagged for notability since 2013, only survived its first nom because no one commented properly. Fails guidelines per nom. Sgubaldo (talk) 01:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: The strongest coverage is the 2008 Bits blog piece quoting company reps on their former Cybersquatting business model, but I don't see that as sufficient to demonstrate notability; nor does their more recent focus on AI analytics appear to have demonstrable notability. AllyD (talk) 11:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.