Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcius D. Raymond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  10:03, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Marcius D. Raymond

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable genealogist who worked for historical societies. He owned two newspapers. Note that I just removed some irrelevant information from the article so that people skimming the article wouldn't think he was a bicentennial man... much of it was about his ancestry. Also moved some things around for clarity. In terms of BEFORE, did some poking on Newspapers.com, Newspaper Archive, and Google Books, and found nothing relevant. That said, if someone finds more indication of notability, please let me know and I will withdraw the nomination. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 12:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 12:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep publisher of two newspapers. A gbooks search of: Raymond "Washington at Tarrytown" shows that the paper got some attention. Also, I can find newspaper mentions using his surname and a keyword, but mostly they discuss him with his initials rather than a first name. IceFishing (talk) 15:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:14, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete being a publisher of minor and often non-notable papers does not make one notable. No actual indication of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.