Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Bolognesi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Marco Bolognesi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable photographer. Speedy declined. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Sufficient in-depth coverage in reliable sources to establish notability and verifiability under WP:BIO. I added a couple of articles and a reference of exhibitions to the article and there are plenty more available. Drawn Some (talk) 13:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage of this person found Arma virumque cano (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC) This user has since been blocked as a sockpuppet. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 19:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This user's primarily contributions to Wikipedia have been to !vote (primarily delete) on dozens of AfDs approximately 1 minute apart from each other. See AN thread --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Well obviously you didn't click on the links I added or you would have "found" them. Drawn Some (talk) 14:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Found where? (There's none behind my fridge either.) -- Hoary (talk) 16:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Drawn Some is correct if they are implying that Arma has a habit of jumping in on dozens of AfD discussions adding nothing but cliches. Drmies (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Google news search turns up plenty of in-depth stories such as this one, in Italian but published in reputable newspapers. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 16:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lots of coverage. -- Hoary (talk) 16:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.