Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Foschi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 13:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Marco Foschi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:GNG no coverage in outside sources, Web search comes up blank. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 02:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete notability missing search came up short for significant coverage. per WP:OUTLET I took the liberty of creating an article on [WikiPeeps.Wikia.Com/ WikiPeeps]. Bryce Carmony (talk) 03:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep, easily passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR requirements, the nominator's argument that "Web search comes up blank" lacks sense as long as clicking the link I see over 26,000 results. Most importantly, the subject received significant coverage in the most important Italian newspapers, i.e. La Repubblica and Corriere della sera (I limited my search on them), eg., , , , . Here he is referred as "the best young actor in Italy", here as "a stage animal, he is in my opinion the best of his generation". He had leading roles in multiple notable productions, including In Your Hands, King of the Sands and Purple Sea. He also passes WP:ANYBIO as he won an important stage award, the Le Maschere Award for Best Actor in 2005 (source), and was awarded best actor at the Annecy Film Festival in 2004  (source). Cavarrone  17:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: enough foreign language coverage exists for the subject to meet WP:BASIC. Esquivalience t 23:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:Cavarrone. Given the sources found the delete !votes can be discounted entirely. --Michig (talk) 07:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.