Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Lupis (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Flowerparty ☀ 01:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Marco Lupis
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This was previously deleted under CSD A7. Essentially, the guy is a journalist, so there may be a lot of articles he has written to cite (as with all journalists), but there is no substantial media sources written about him, rather than by him. As such, I don't think he meets the threshold required for an article. There is also substantial evidence that the article has been written by the subject himself. See his Italian Wikipedia banning and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Villa Tatti. Dominic·t 12:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Ghits (or other occurrences of a name), do not create notability, coverage does.  MBisanz  talk 12:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, quoting MBisanz. -- Roberto  Segnali all'Indiano  12:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, quoting Roberto. --Henrykus talk 12:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrykus (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. Again. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 14:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 14:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 14:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. Cunard (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Lot of nonsense: 1) the user "dominic" who open the deletion process, totally modified and "reversed" the whole article, erasing all the previously indicated citations about him, so it is totally false that " there is no substantial media sources written about him, rather than by him" as asserted by "dominic" herself.

Here the (incomplete) list of citations about him, previously indicated into the article and erased by "dominic":