Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Ramilli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Marco Ramilli

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no assertion of notability. The page has been written completely by him. Ciaby (Ciaby) 23:05, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete: per G11. An IP has placed an A7 tag but that's the wrong criterion IMO.    SITH   (talk)   21:36, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Move to draft space - while Blow it up and start over is an option, the subject does appear to have some notability, which could be determined with a massive article cleanup to remove those sources that aren't about him (there are plenty that mention him and others that he authored). In any case, a COI editor should never try to publish an article in main space. This could be a keeper but needs a thorough review, and draft space is the best place for it to incubate. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:58, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete regardless of any possible notability, this is pure promotionalism. G11 would be perhaps the best response. I would not move it to draft space, since any possible article would have to be started over from scratch.  DGG ( talk ) 03:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as unambiguous WP:PROMO. Bakazaka (talk) 08:24, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this promotional text masquerading as a Wikipedia article and put together by a kamikaze. Also, texts unworthy of future consideration are not to be moved to "draft space." Well, there is very little here for future consideration. -The Gnome (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.