Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcos Vinícius dos Santos Rosa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Marcos Vinícius dos Santos Rosa

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about footballer who has only played semi-professionally except for a 10-minute appearance in the K. League. There is no online Portuguese-language coverage of this footballer other than database entries, match reports and transfer announcements (and nothing at all which would be in-depth coverage). Although having played in a few minutes in a fully-pro league match creates a presumption of notability under WP:NFOOTBALL, there is a long-standing consensus that when an article comprehensively fails WP:GNG as this does, the presumption isn't valid. Jogurney (talk) 05:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:55, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  09:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG, which is far more important than scraping by on NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of sources to justify an article on someone that has played 10 mins of professional sport Spiderone  21:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete there are not enough sources to justify this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per rationale by & . Furthermore a before search doesn’t show hits with in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 21:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep It's better to have a complete set of articles here for WP:NFOOTBALL than maintain a complete set on another site and a separate incomplete set here. Subject-specific guidelines are more important than WP:GNG as a reason to delete an article, there's no reason to say they shouldn't be as a reason to keep an article. Peter James (talk) 17:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.