Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Hale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Marcus Hale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person is not a notable songwriter. None of the sources in the article meet the reliability requirement, and I could not find any other sources. This article was recreated after having been deleted under A11 and G3. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete All the references in the article at present are generally trivial mentions of the person having written a song, no in-depth coverage to demonstrate meeting notability guidelines. I also believe this article is incorrectly named, during the history of the page the person has been variously called "Blair Gormal" (also deleted at this location), "Phoenix Decker" and the current "Marcus Hale". The only name I can see to be correct is "Blair Gormal". FDW777 (talk) 23:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, Agree with nom. he does not  show significant RS to be notable.  Alex-h (talk) 08:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - lacks significant coverage to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can find nothing to show that this person passes either WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 19:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with the comments above that the subject does not seem to meet notability. Also the issue with the name as pointed out by User:FDW777 seems odd and raises questions about accuracy. Dunarc (talk) 23:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.