Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Orelias


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Marcus Orelias

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article with no evidence of meeting WP:NACTOR or WP:MUSBIO. The one RS fails verification. See also Articles for deletion/20s a Difficult Age, created by the same SPA. David Gerard (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. TheKaphox   T  15:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per nom. Why are the 1,000 other articles without any sources not being checked?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheShopArt (talk • contribs) 16:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I'm not finding, which was a given, and none of this is actually convincing as they are simply his own listings cited as sources. SwisterTwister   talk  18:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sooo the news sources cited are not credible? Come on — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheShopArt (talk • contribs) 18:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * This page is not even close to the one being asked to be deleted citation or information wise, the person clearly was using it to promote themselves as a wiki page should. There are many indie label, authors etc I've seen who have pages without credible sources at all. There are people who are doing fantastic work who deserve Wiki pages to increase opportunities. We all have to start somewhere. Delete it if you must but it's a waste of time because this artist will be relevant in a matter of months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheShopArt (talk • contribs) 20:10, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment same SPA created Marcus orelias last year which was A7ed, both titles would need salting. Also removed the AFD notice twice, has been warned - David Gerard (talk) 23:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, that was last year this is this year, I felt there were more sources, this is dumb like I said if you're going to delete it then delete it but this article has over 41 articles that support the artist and people mentioned in the article. Also what should be "deleted" is subjective and based on personal taste of the people reviewing it can be biased because most of the younger generation making noise in music are not in the head lines 24/7 so this judging process is unfair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheShopArt (talk • contribs) 23:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find reliable sources after searching quite deeply. Fails NACTOR. Fails MUSBIO. Fails GNG, BASIC. Lourdes  13:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.